ConstructFlow keeps Submittals, RFIs, comments, approvals, and final PDFs in one centralized workflow — with AI that surfaces the source data before your team even responds.
Built for the firms running the work — not selling the dashboard.
Workflow pillars
ConstructFlow keeps routing, reminders, comments, approvals, final files, and re-submittals connected so each team can see what changed and what needs action.
Move Submittals through internal and external review groups with comments, final status, alerts, and re-submittal cycles tied together.
Keep design clarifications connected to reviewers, reminders, attachments, final response language, and the source material that informed the answer.
Carry available Submittal review documents, RFI responses, comment history, and status context into project handoff.
Product preview
The dashboard view brings review queues, comments, final PDFs, permissions, and page-aware evidence into one place.
Product preview
The review dashboard brings Submittals, RFIs, status, the AI answer panel, and source evidence cards into a single surface your team already understands.
Live product surface — Submittal and RFI dashboard with status, comments, and review context.
Record
Submittals, RFIs, comments, files, and PDF pages
AI stance
Source-backed and human-reviewed
Control
Permissions, status history, and exports
AI review intelligence
ConstructFlow's AI works the way reviewers do — it points to the source before suggesting language, and your team approves what goes out.
AI answer with source evidence
Review-ready answer draft
The current record indicates the door hardware substitution still needs architect review because the latest RFI response references the approved finish schedule, while the submittal comments ask for a revised cut sheet before final approval.
RFI-017 Final Response
Reviewer response references finish schedule and requires confirmation before release.
Door Hardware Submittal Cycle 2
Open comment requests a revised cut sheet and updated manufacturer data.
Finish Schedule page reference
Indexed page evidence points reviewers to the relevant schedule location when available.
Summarize what the record says and show the Submittal, RFI, comment, file, or PDF page behind the response.
Draft RFI language from reviewer comments, final PDF text, related Submittals, and attachments for review before sending.
Summarize changes, commenters, unresolved issues, likely next steps, and final-status context for the review team.
Turn rough notes into clearer internal or external-facing comments while keeping the reviewer in control.
Rank open work by due dates, status, unresolved comments, review cycles, and missing attachments.
Expose page references and visual descriptions for image-heavy pages where configured evidence is available.
Evidence preview
AI evidence views pair a user question with suggested answer language, source cards, page references, and reviewer comment evidence.
Product preview — AI evidence panel with page-aware search results and reviewer comment sources.
Sources
RFI responses, Submittal comments, files, and pages
Review step
Draft language remains reviewer-approved
Built for everyone in the cycle
Project managers, project engineers, reviewers, and external collaborators work from one review history without flattening every role into the same access level.
Review queues, alerts, and status history help managers keep Submittals and RFIs moving without spreadsheet reconciliation.
Attach context, track comments, create final PDFs, and find prior answers before sending work to the next reviewer.
Internal and external reviewers can focus on decisions while ConstructFlow preserves comments, status, and versions.
Where ConstructFlow works hardest
Use ConstructFlow where review context, due dates, final status, and document history need to stay connected across many participants.
Keep attachments, comments, approvals, and re-submittal history tied to the package.
Use review status, missing attachments, and due-date context to help teams focus on time-sensitive material decisions.
Bring comments, related files, page references, and prior decisions into one answer workflow before human approval.
Preserve final documents, review cycles, status decisions, and exports for project closeout needs.
Trust and control
ConstructFlow gives you the controls that hold up under audit: project-level permissions, version history, comment-driven status, and exports your team can hand over.
Project-level permissions
Control which participants can review, comment, approve, or export per project.
Audit trail and version history
Every comment, status change, and document version is preserved against the review record.
Hand-off ready exports
Generate final PDFs, coversheets, and exports built for handover and closeout.
Source-backed AI
AI suggestions point to the underlying Submittal, RFI, comment, or PDF page before reviewers approve.
Project record
Source-backed construction project examples with formal Submittal and RFI review demands ConstructFlow is built to support.
$1.2B+
In approved public award value across the launch set
Through 2029
On active multi-year project schedules
7
Consent-decree fit records, audit-ready examples
City and County of Honolulu Department of Environmental Services
$516.7MPhase 1C upgrades liquid-stream and solids-stream treatment processes, including influent screening, grit removal, HRBC conversion, dissolved air flotation tanks, thermal hydrolysis, cogeneration, electrical/control upgrades, and SCADA enhancements.
City and County of Honolulu Department of Environmental Services
$158MThe KRWWTP TIPS and Headworks project included a deep tunnel influent pump station, headworks facility, mini influent pump station, generator/electrical distribution building, fuel tank pad, force main, utilities, drainage improvements, and tunnel-interface coordination.
City and County of Honolulu Department of Environmental Services
$267.2MPhase 1B expanded Honouliuli secondary treatment with aeration basins, six secondary clarifiers, a blower building, mixed liquor distribution, a secondary process pump station, generator/emergency-power capacity, odor control, electrical, civil, SCADA, and primary-treatment improvements.
Start exploring
Review the product workflow, AI features, plan options, or model the operational value of structured Submittal and RFI review with your own assumptions.
See how Submittals, RFIs, source-backed search, comments, and final PDFs fit together.
Review the evidence panel, source cards, and AI modules designed for construction document workflows.
Compare AI Search capacity, project limits, and workflow intelligence packages.
Model coordination hours, labor value, and plan cost with your own assumptions. Results stay illustrative.
Pricing
Standard and Professional cover defined project capacity. Enterprise starts as a custom-capacity plan for larger review programs.
$1,200
per month
$2,800
per month
From $6,500
per month
Common questions
These answers keep the public claims grounded in workflow, source evidence, and human-approved review decisions.
ConstructFlow focuses on Submittals and RFIs: review routing, internal and external comments, approvals, final status, document creation, re-submittals, permissions, alerts, search, and exports.
AI assists review work by helping search the record, summarize review context, draft response language, and surface source evidence. Reviewers still approve decisions and outgoing language.
Search can use indexed PDF page evidence where text, OCR, or configured visual descriptions are available. Image-heavy files may need additional setup before their content is searchable.
Professional is designed for teams managing up to 20 active projects with decision intelligence, conflict detection, and risk prioritization. Enterprise starts with unlimited active projects, broader governance, and custom AI Search capacity terms.
Use the contact form on this page. Include your team size, project count, and whether Submittals, RFIs, or AI Search are the first priority.
Contact
Tell us how your team manages Submittals, RFIs, review comments, and final document packages. We will route your request to the right person.
Good walkthrough context
Project count, active review volume, external reviewer needs, and whether AI Search is a priority.
Existing account support
Signed-in users can submit support tickets from the application. Public requests can start here.
Start with the Submittals, RFIs, comments, and final PDFs that already drive your decisions — with AI evidence reviewers can stand behind.